Good morning Newgrounders and I hope you all had yourselves a good Easter. I'm back for more reviews and I want to share my system with you guys on how I review flash games and animations.

Presentation-How are you executing your flash and making it appeal to us will be a great factor in a review.

Subject of Seriousness-If a flash is to be serious then I expect seriousness throughout. If you add an animation that completely breaks away from the mood that it had set so successfully for the sake of a cheap laugh with low-brow humor then a serious jeopardizing of flash's score can occure.

Art Style-I really don't care if your an artistic god or otherwise. I just want the art style to be appropriate for the flash. If you are going for a serious story line with less than satisfactory art skill then I will not mind at all. If your doing it for the sake of humor then your score can be at stake if it is not a satirical piece.

Animation-In a flash I expect polished character movement that is appropriate for the flash. Movement can be difficult to execute (especially in games). Try your best because to me this isn't a paramount factor (to an extent).

Sound-In ANY I repeat ANY flash there should be decent sound quality or else the score will surely suffer. I've been pretty leniant with sound in the past, but no more will I tolerate poor voice-overs, sound effects, etc.

Musical Score-Only in games does this really count. I expect music to be clear and that fits the world the game is immersed in. I also want originality, something self-made. If not, give credit to its creator.

Controls-For games only. I don't want controls to be too sluggish or too sensative. This can create a mass amount of complaints from critics as well as me. I also want the controls to be intuitive and simple but still gives a wide variety of actions you can perform. This mostly pertains to action and shooting genres as well as adventure genres as well.

Plot-Usually in action and adventure games and flash movies is this a factor. I want something that makes it worth my time playing and/or watching. I want characters to be interactive and I want the plot rich with content. A huge factor in most cases.

Time Lapse- A factor in all flash movies and games. If something is just too short or too long, then there is a problem. 1:The flash ends when it starts to get good. 2: It just keeps stretching on and the plot stinks at the same time. A flash needs moderation. This is a HUGE factor all the time.

Bias-I try my damndest not be biased with a review. I look at both the pros and the cons of any flash. If a flash is anything but satisfactory I still try to name the good things about that flash. If I DO turn out to be biased then I will gladly rereview the flash in question upon the AUTHOR'S REQUEST ONLY! Sorry no pissed off fans can convince me.

Effort-I can see if an author put effort into their work or not. This is a COLOSSSAL factor.

10-Having so little flaws that are completely diregarded due to astounding work and effort upon the author's part.

9-Just about everything ten is, but flaws are more apparent but not serious in the least bit.

8-Still very good with a change here or there that could've been better, but still a great flash.

7-Just like eight except the changes wanted are more essential. Still a good flash.

6-The flash is at least decent but the flaws are pretty noticeable and should be dealt with.

5-The flaws of the flash are serious but not horribly. Still pretty decent but not very satisfactory either.

4-The flash's pros and cons are at nearly the same level with the bad outweighing the good, a little more than slightly. Flash skills are put into question.

3-This just isn't your business. A flash that just couldn't do it. A bad flash in the end.

2-The flash is just horrible and people shouldn't waste their time with. If they do.....they're not people.

1-I am death and I will endow a plague onto your dwellings, burn your family, and rape your eyes and ears!

0-No such score exists in my book. If you make a flash this bad I'll actually GIVE you a point for doing so.

NOTE: I do not review anything pornographic (except for Sonic the Pervert, which I was biased in reviewing..my apologies). I also do not review internet pranks such as screamers. It makes sense in the end. Am I supposed to comment on how round that chicks butt was or how long that dude's boner is or even how loud I screamed my head off seeing Linda Blaire's tortured face scream at me? Not something I enjoy, period.